Peer Review
The editorial board of peer reviewers will not simply ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ submissions; instead, we will work with artists and authors, providing feedback and encouraging resubmissions.
Criteria
Upon being assigned a work, peer reviewers will be asked to address five basic criteria with a key: 2 = meets criterion; 1 = partial meets criterion; 0 = does not meet criterion:
[ ]
Addresses issues of equity and social justice in higher education.[ ]
Ideas are clearly articulated and supported.[ ]
Quality of the medium enables all to perceive the ideas.[ ]
Ideas supported by or taps into collective knowledge, scholarly work, embodied or intuitive knowledge or oral traditions.[ ]
Work is aligned with the theme of the journal volume.Recommendations A peer reviewer will then select one of four options:
Peer reviewers can also share additional thoughts or insights with the artist/author.
The International Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Higher Education ethical and transparency practices reflect the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics and follows their core practice guidelines on all ethical matters.
Authors, artists, podcasters, videographers, and other contributors published in the journal will be referred to collectively as contributors in the following statement.
When submitting an article or work to The International Journal of Equity and Social Justice in Higher Education the contributor/s understand and agree to the following conditions: